10 min⚡️13 min10 min8 min 29 sec6 min 47 sec5 min 59 sec5 min 5 sec4 min 4 sec
0.8×
1×
1.2×
1.5×
1.7×
2×
2.5×
10 min⚡️13 min10 min8 min 29 sec6 min 47 sec5 min 59 sec5 min 5 sec4 min 4 sec
joy
1
love
2
wow
3
yay
4
up
5
down
6
More reactions
7
11 Comments
Samuel Stroschein
May 15, 2023
(edited)
please refrain from saying 'free forever' because we don;t know :D If "free forever" changes at some point -> shitstorm.
I think tailscale's communication https://tailscale.com/blog/free-plan/ is on point: Its free for individual devs and open source because it helps us getting large enterprise to hear and pay for inlang
Reply
Samuel Stroschein
May 15, 2023
Way better targeting by showing Frameworks instead of "loved by developers at"!
Gives a clearer "this is useful to me" hook. Love it! Maybe add Flutter to the Frameworks to signal that inlang is not bound to the web only. Albeit, someone needs to write a flutter plugin.
Shannon Mante-Green
May 16, 2023
👍
Reply
Felix Häberle
May 16, 2023
great job als always!!
1. isn't the two sections "Integrate" & "Config" not redudant? I integrate it with the config, so therefore I would have seen this as one section and put it side by side which also let's the page be more "full" and not that empty. To put it short: The information density could be higher – what is your opinion on that? For example when you visit nextjs.org or astro.build, there you see a much better use of screen real-estate
2. To the previous landing page, the individual products are loosing focus right now and are not presented in a fortunate way. Also again refering to sites like next or astro: they tell you what's "inside the box", telling in a short list or columns the best features of the specific products and give it more space / a slightly better(bigger) visualization – video not required, just tell me the top features in a few easy words.
Reply
Niklas Buchfink
May 15, 2023
Maybe we can include other languages to show that it also works for Flutter and Python, for example.
Samuel Stroschein
May 15, 2023
I had the same thought, expressed right above!
Jannes Blobel
May 15, 2023
👍
Jannes Blobel
May 15, 2023
But it isn't easy to find a way of communicating that explains that inlang basically works with everything. And at the same time, convey the feeling: “Nice, it works with my framework."
Let me know if it is not understandable :)
Reply
Samuel Stroschein
May 15, 2023
I propose to flip the visual. Show the apps first, then the config beneath.
The config caught me off-guard as in "why do I need this?" upon scrolling down, the apps become visible which give a clear "yes, i want this [and to get it i need to config]". It seems to make sense to show the "yes, I want this" first and then show the "this is all powered by one config"
Jannes Blobel
May 15, 2023
Hmm... I am of two minds about it. Yes, you are right. Showing the product the user wants and then setting it up makes sense.
On the other hand, it's like. Wow, I can set the product with just one file. Amazing, I'll try it out (like in a supermarket where the price is so low you don't worry about whether you need it or not).
Jannes Blobel
May 15, 2023
(edited)
But either way, the visual communication makes it clear that you get all products with one config/ bridge.
Reply
I
Ivan Hofer
May 16, 2023
I would get rid of the arrows here, since they usually indicate you are beeing redirected to an external page
Reply
I
Ivan Hofer
May 16, 2023
a good hover effect should be enough to tell poeple that the card is clickable
Reply
Samuel Stroschein
May 15, 2023
"Individual usage and open source stays free. Enterprise pricing coming soon."
I think tailscale's communication https://tailscale.com/blog/free-plan/ is on point: Its free for individual devs and open source because it helps us getting large enterprise to hear and pay for inlang
Gives a clearer "this is useful to me" hook. Love it! Maybe add Flutter to the Frameworks to signal that inlang is not bound to the web only. Albeit, someone needs to write a flutter plugin.
1. isn't the two sections "Integrate" & "Config" not redudant? I integrate it with the config, so therefore I would have seen this as one section and put it side by side which also let's the page be more "full" and not that empty. To put it short: The information density could be higher – what is your opinion on that?
For example when you visit nextjs.org or astro.build, there you see a much better use of screen real-estate
2. To the previous landing page, the individual products are loosing focus right now and are not presented in a fortunate way. Also again refering to sites like next or astro: they tell you what's "inside the box", telling in a short list or columns the best features of the specific products and give it more space / a slightly better(bigger) visualization – video not required, just tell me the top features in a few easy words.
Let me know if it is not understandable :)
The config caught me off-guard as in "why do I need this?" upon scrolling down, the apps become visible which give a clear "yes, i want this [and to get it i need to config]". It seems to make sense to show the "yes, I want this" first and then show the "this is all powered by one config"
Yes, you are right. Showing the product the user wants and then setting it up makes sense.
On the other hand, it's like. Wow, I can set the product with just one file. Amazing, I'll try it out (like in a supermarket where the price is so low you don't worry about whether you need it or not).